trainingowl

🦉 Concurrency Model 🦉

Content

• Overview
• Rendering Components
• Semantics
• Asynchronous Rendering

Overview

Owl was designed from the very beginning with asynchronous components. This comes from the willStart and the willUpdateProps lifecycle hooks. With these asynchronous hooks, it is possible to build complex highly concurrent applications.

Owl concurrent mode has several benefits: it makes it possible to delay the rendering until some asynchronous operation is complete, it makes it possible to lazy load libraries, while keeping the previous screen completely functional. It is also good for performance reasons: Owl uses it to only apply the result of many different renderings only once in an animation frame. Owl can cancel a rendering that is no longer relevant, restart it, reuse it in some cases.

But even though using concurrency is quite simple (and is the default behaviour), asynchrony is difficult, because it introduces an additional dimension that vastly increase the complexity of an application. This section will explain how Owl manages this complexity, how concurrent rendering works in a general way.

Rendering Components

The word rendering is a little vague, so, let us explain more precisely the process by which Owl components are displayed on a screen.

When a component is mounted or updated, a new rendering is started. It has two phases: virtual rendering and patching.

Virtual rendering

This phase represent the process of rendering a template, in memory, which creates a virtual representation of the desired component html). The output of this phase is a virtual DOM.

It is asynchronous: each subcomponents needs to either be created (so, willStart will need to be called), or updated (which is done with the willUpdateProps method). This is completely a recursive process: a component is the root of a component tree, and each sub component needs to be (virtually) rendered.

Patching

Once a rendering is complete, it will be applied on the next animation frame. This is done synchronously: the whole component tree is patched to the real DOM.

Semantics

We give here an informal description of the way components are created/updated in an application. Here, ordered lists describe actions that are executed sequentially, bullet lists describe actions that are executed in parallel.

Scenario 1: initial rendering Imagine we want to render the following component tree:

        A
       / \
      B   C
         / \
        D   E

Here is what happen whenever we mount the root component (with some code like app.mount(document.body)).

1. willStart is called on A

2. when it is done, template A is rendered.

   • component B is created
     1. willStart is called on B
     2. template B is rendered
   • component C is created
     1. willStart is called on C
     2. template C is rendered
        • component D is created
          1. willStart is called on D
          2. template D is rendered
        • component E is created
          1. willStart is called on E
          2. template E is rendered

3. each components are patched into a detached DOM element, in the following order: E, D, C, B, A. (so the actual full DOM tree is created in one pass)

4. the component A root element is actually appended to document.body

5. The method mounted is called recursively on all components in the following order: E, D, C, B, A.

Scenario 2: updating a component. Now, let’s assume that the user clicked on some button in C, and this results in a state update, which is supposed to:

• update D,
• remove E,
• add new component F.

So, the component tree should look like this:

        A
       / \
      B   C
         / \
        D   F

Here is what Owl will do:

1. because of a state change, the method render is called on C

2. template C is rendered again

   • component D is updated:
     1. hook willUpdateProps is called on D (async)
     2. template D is rerendered
   • component F is created:
     1. hook willStart is called on F (async)
     2. template F is rendered

3. willPatch hooks are called recursively on components C, D (not on F, because it is not mounted yet)

4. components F, D are patched in that order

5. component C is patched, which will cause recursively:

   1. willUnmount hook on E
   2. destruction of E,
6. mounted hook is called on F, patched hooks are called on D, C

Tags are very small helpers to make it easy to write inline templates. There is only one currently available tag: xml.

Asynchronous Rendering

Working with asynchronous code always adds a lot of complexity to a system. Whenever different parts of a system are active at the same time, one needs to think carefully about all possible interactions. Clearly, this is also true for Owl components.

There are two different common problems with Owl asynchronous rendering model:

• any component can delay the rendering (initial and subsequent) of the whole application
• for a given component, there are two independant situations that will trigger an asynchronous rerendering: a change in the state, or a change in the props. These changes may be done at different times, and Owl has no way of knowing how to reconcile the resulting renderings.

Here are a few tips on how to work with asynchronous components:

1. Minimize the use of asynchronous components!
2. Lazy loading external libraries is a good use case for async rendering. This is mostly fine, because we can assume that it will only takes a fraction of a second, and only once.

This site is open source. Improve this page.